Top posting users this week | |
Top posting users this month | |
Who is online? | In total there are 39 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 39 Guests :: 1 Bot None Most users ever online was 883 on Mon May 24, 2021 8:15 am |
| | Fake ( Inactive ) | |
| | |
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Fake ( Inactive ) Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:38 pm | |
| If the victim has no fear or one that cannot take a physical form, the Fear Illusion does not work. Laughing, no matter what kind (fake, genuine, nervous) will dispell Angst. I don't godmod, and I never will. I'm not stupid enough to do that, let alone lock your character (or anyone else's) in a box or kill them or anything of the like.
Pure-hearted people wouldn't be affected, but you'd pretty much have to be Azural to be "pure hearted". Remember, actions speak louder than words (and intent), and everyone makes mistakes. Kaiser uses the crosses like he would a baseball bat; he attacks whoever it is with them.
-sigh-
I don't mean to be rude, JaK, but you're acting like a wannabe mod. It's cool and all that you give members critiques on their characters and stuff, but you word it like you have the power to accept or decline! Sure you have questions, but don't go about it in such a cocky way! You're complaining about godmodding, yet you're trying to take over the real moderators' jobs! Just take a look at the "Official Titan Roster/Sign up Thread", and even the "Christmas Attack" one. I love the idea, and I want to participate, but I asked if the mods had O.K.'d it for a reason; I don't want to get chewed out like you did with the member list!
Sorry it had to come down to this, but I couldn't stand your backseat-modding anymore. I'm just so tired of it, and I'm sure a lot of other members (including staff) are too. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Fake ( Inactive ) Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:53 pm | |
| Uhhhh I'm just asking questions, if you don't want to answer them YOU DONT HAVE TO ???
If you want I could wait and ask the same thing in a thread when I RP with you, I just figured I'd make the inquiries now. So that way there would be no confusion later like what happened in Move it thread when Will made an inquiry about your char Honest and you got angry.
I never said I had the power to do decline chars and the cockiness thing is your opinion. It's the internet bud, you can't see my face or hear my tone of voice when I say something. SO to you it sounds cocky, to me it sounds like an average question.
I meant the Godmod part as in a "don't you agree tone", never said you would do it at all and I have NEVER accused you of doing it IMO that's just you taking a simple question too far and lastly if you feel I'm back seat modding don't answer my questions again...
Really, I get it no one likes to have their characters questioned, but if YOUR app's not clear to me and in the near future I might have to deal with your character. I have a right to understand what he can and can't do.
Also, on the Sign-Up thread GET YOUR FACTS straight. As I explained to Emblem and everyone else I did consult with a Mod (SIM) and as you can see the thread is now official. It was a misunderstanding that was resolved and a simple Santa storyline that will not affect the entire RPG, I see no reason for it having to be Ok'd with a moderator.
PS. If you check the Rocky Road to Dublin thread I did try to ask who to consult about storyline and was given no answer, no ones trying to be a mod here... |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Fake ( Inactive ) Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:20 am | |
| My dear JaK. You completely missed my point.
I'm not pissed off about you asking legit questions on Fake, and that's why I replied to them. If I didn't like you because of that, I wouldn't have even replied. I like constructive critism, but I don't like cockiness.
And on this whole character thing... you posted on Julie, Jade, Chris, Kay, and a whole lot more character's profiles. Is that also just for clarification? I read the sign-up thread. I realize your points. But just because you talked to Simca doens't mean you really had the right. WHOOPEE, it's official. I really don't care, just that you "modded" again.
With the Santa thread, I'm just being careful. You didn't think your sign-up thread had to be approved, now did you? I'm honestly trying to save my own ass from having what happened to you happen to me. I'm just thinking that if you're involving all three teams, it might affect the whole RPG.
Look, I'm sorry you can't see my points. I'm just stating my opinion, you can take it or leave it--just like your advice on Fake. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Fake ( Inactive ) Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:17 pm | |
| One last thing, Julie was for clarification and SIlent also commented on her profile...Is that him trying to be a mod too??? ON Jade, Kaaitsu, and Midget they asked me to go over theirs because they value my opinion. GO FIGURE. Before you accuse me of being a Mod or trying to have some kind of authority over peoples Apps. or being cocky maybe you should get your facts straight and research; then you'd know why I do the things I do. Also, if you read my points on those same apps, you'd see that I always say I'm not a Mod and that SIm or Emm are the ones who will approve your app. I even put on Julie's that she didn't even need to answer my questions. These things I write on others apps are just inquiries, not me trying to force my opinion on others. - Quote :
- WHOOPEE, it's official. I really don't care, just that you "modded" again.
This sounds WAAAY more cocky than anything I've said so far BTW. So please point your finger, which you so blantantly like to wag at me at yourself. In fact, the only crime you can say I've actually committed here is spamming this characters thread with replies. Instead of trying to FLAME me by putting a label on me such as "wannabe mod" which is extremely disrespectful on your part or sticking words in my mouth, by trying to say I'm trying to seem like I have some authority over others and I apparently COMPLAIN about you goddmodding?? When in another thread I just appraised your roleplaying skills and still want to have you play the role of evil santa. Try coming with concrete evidence next time, kay? Like me actually saying something that seems like I had authority. Like "your char will be denied" or me actually saying I'm a Mod. Otherwise, NO I will not see YOUR points because they have NO substance or merit behind them. ~Good Day To Your Sir. PS. After talking to Crazy, Foal, AJ, Ammagad and Silent none of them seem to have this opinion of me either. So ya dude, I have no clue where you're coming from... |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Fake ( Inactive ) Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:33 pm | |
| That's fine, JaK. I'm just stating my opinion--whether you get pissed off about it is entirely up to you. I don't want to cause anymore unnecessary drama than has already happened, so I'll leave it at that.
Good day to you, too. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Fake ( Inactive ) Fri Nov 25, 2011 2:39 pm | |
| UPDATED ON: 11 / 25 / 11 Only minor revisions have been made, but another look-through would be nice. |
| | | DeadRage Skilled Metahuman
Posts : 204 Join date : 2011-08-17 Age : 30
RPG character Name: Code Name: Villain or good guy?:
| Subject: Re: Fake ( Inactive ) Sat Nov 26, 2011 10:56 am | |
| Wow, you adn Jak had one MAJOR argument last year | |
| | | Guest Guest
| | | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Fake ( Inactive ) | |
| |
| | | | Fake ( Inactive ) | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |